Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸Ä¡ºÎ ·¹Áø ¼öº¹ Àç·áÀÇ °¡¼öºÐÇØ

HYDROLYTIC DEGRADATION OF POSTERIOR RESIN RESTORATIVE MATERIALS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2001³â 28±Ç 4È£ p.673 ~ 682
¾ç±ÔÈ£, ¹Ú¹Ì¶õ, ÃÖ³²±â, ¹ÚÀºÇý,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ç±ÔÈ£ ( Yang Kyu-Ho ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç&Ä¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
¹Ú¹Ì¶õ ( Park Mi-Ran ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç&Ä¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
ÃÖ³²±â ( Choi Nam-Ki ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç&Ä¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
¹ÚÀºÇý ( Park Eun-Hae ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç&Ä¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

¿ì¼öÇÑ ½É¹Ì¼º ¼öº¹Àç·á·Î¼­ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀº ±× »ç¿ë ºóµµ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·± Áõ°¡ Ãß¼¼¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ ºÎÀûÀýÇÑ ¸¶¸ðÀúÇ×¼º ¶§¹®¿¡ ±¸Ä¡ºÎ ¼öº¹¿¡¼­ÀÇ »ç¿ëÀÌ Á¦ÇѵǾî¿Ô´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ÀÎÀÚ·Î ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ Ç¥¸éÇÏ ºÐÇØ°¡ °í·ÁµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ ¸¶¸ð¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ȯ°æÀû ºÐÇØÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ ¾Ë±â À§ÇØ ¾ËÄ«¸®¼º ¿ë¾×(0.1N NaOH)¿¡ ÇöÀç ¸¹ÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â Definite( AG, Germany), Prodigy(Kerr, USA), Pyramid(Bisco, USA) ¹× Synergy(Coltene, Swiss) µî 4Á¾ÀÇ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ» º¸°üÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ °¢ Á¦Ç°ÀÇ ºÐÇØ°úÁ¤À» Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ Á¦Ç° ´ç 3°³ÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÑ ÈÄ 0.1N NaOH¿ë¾×¿¡ ÀúÀåÇÏ¿© ¿¡¼­ º¸°üÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2ÁÖ ÈÄ Á¦°ÅÇÏ¿© HCl·Î ÁßÈ­, ¼¼Ã´ ÈÄ ¿¡¼­ °ÇÁ¶ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹«°Ô ¼Õ½Ç, ºÐÇØÃþ ±íÀÌ, Si³óµµ µîÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ºÐÇØÀúÇ×¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. ¹«°Ô ¼Õ½ÇÀº Synergy¿¡¼­ ·Î °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ªÀ» º¸¿´À¸³ª °¢ Á¦Ç°°£ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 2. ºÐÇØÃþ ±íÀÌ´Â Synergy¿¡¼­ ·Î °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ªÀ» º¸¿´°í, Synergy¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ´Ù¸¥ Á¦Ç°¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 3. Si ¿ëÃâ·®¿¡ À־´Â 4°¡Áö Á¦Ç° ¸ðµÎ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 4. ¹«°Ô ¼Õ½Ç°ú ºÐÇØÃþ ±íÀÌ »çÀÌ¿¡´Â ³ôÀº »ó°ü °ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(r=0.6127, p<0.05). 5. ¹«°Ô ¼Õ½Ç°ú Si ¿ëÃâ·®, ºÐÇØÃþ ±íÀÌ¿Í Si ¿ëÃâ·® »çÀÌ¿¡ »ó°ü °ü°è´Â ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 6. ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æ °üÂû½Ã NaOH ¿ë¾×¿¡ º¸°üÇÑ ÈÄ ·¹Áø ±âÁú°ú ÇÊ·¯ »çÀÌÀÇ °áÇÕ Æı«¸¦ °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.¸ç, Porphyromonas gingivalis ´Üµ¶ ¹è¾ç½Ã ħÀü¹°ÀÇ ¹èÁö Èí±¤µµ´Â 1.932À̾úÀ¸³ª ºÐ¸®±ÕÁÖ¿Í º´ÇÕ ¹è¾ç½Ã¿¡´Â ħÀü¹°ÀÇ ¹èÁö Èí±¤µµ°¡ °¢°¢ 1.170°ú 1.266À¸·Î °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. 6. ºÐ¸®±ÕÁÖ¸¦ API 50 CHL medium kit·Î ź¼öÈ­¹° ¹ßÈ¿°Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ °á°ú, ºÐ¸®±ÕÁÖ 1ÁÖ´Â Lactobacillus salivarius·Î, ´Ù¸¥ ºÐ¸®±ÕÁÖ´Â Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis·Î µ¿Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. 7 ºÐ¸®±ÕÁÖ¸¦ 16S rDNA partial sequencingÀ¸·Î µ¿Á¤ÇÑ °á°ú, 2ÁÖ ¸ðµÎ Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salicinius¿Í À¯ÀüÀÚ À¯»çÄ¡°¡ 99.60%, 99.73%¸¦ º¸¿© Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salicinius·Î µ¿Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇϸé Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½ÄÁõÀÌ ¾ø´Â ¼Ò¾ÆÀÇ Å¸¾×¿¡¼­ ºÐ¸®µÈ À¯»ê±Õ Áß °ú»êÈ­¼ö¼Ò¸¦ ºÐºñÇÏ¿© ÀΰøÄ¡Å Çü¼º°ú Èֹ߼º À¯È²È­ÇÕ¹° »ý¼ºÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ´Â ºÐ¸®±ÕÁÖ´Â Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salicinius·Î µ¿Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù.ÀûÀ¸·Î ³·Àº ¼öÃà·ü°ú ¿ì¼öÇÑ ¹°¼ºÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ³ª³ëÇÊ·¯¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ °æ¿ì, ±âÁ¸ÀÇ hybrid ÇÊ·¯¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ·¹Áø¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ¼öÃàÀÀ·ÂÀ» °¨¼Ò½ÃÅ°Áö´Â ¸øÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³ª³ëÇÊ·¯¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀº °³¹ßÀÇ Ãʱâ´Ü°èÀ̸ç, ¹°¼ºÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ ¾à¹°ÀÎ glycyrrhetinic acid()µµ CCh ÀÚ±ØÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Å¸¾×ºÐºñ¸¦ ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î ¹Ì·ç¾î gap junctionÀº ÈòÁã ¾ÇÇϼ± ¼¼Æ÷·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ Å¸¾×ºÐºñ Á¶Àý¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϴµ¥, ÀÌ´Â gap junctionÀÌ ¼¼Æ÷¸· Åë·Î¸¦ Á¶ÀýÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¼ö¿ëü ÀÚ±ØÀ¸·Î À¯¹ßµÈ ¼¼Æ÷³» ³óµµ º¯È­¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£ °á°úÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î Ãß

The use of resin composites has continued to increase over the last several years. In spite of their growing popularity, composites continue to exhibit a number of undesirable characteristics. One of the major deficiencies of composite restorative resins is their inadequate resistance to wear. Of the multitude of factors that have been associated with wear, subsurface degradation within the restoration is considered to be one. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance to degradation of four commercial composite resins in an alkaline solution. This solution with a high concentration of hydroxyl ions is a convenient medium for accelerated degradation of silane coupling and filler particles. The brands studies were Definite( AG, Germany), Prodigy(Kerr, USA), Pyramid(Bisco, USA) and Synergy(Coltene, Swiss). Preweighed discs of each brand were exposed to 0.1N NaOH solution at . After 14 days they were removed, neutralized with HCl, washed with water and dried. Resistance to degradation was evaluated on the basis of following parameters : (a) mass loss(%)-determined from pre-and post-exposed specimen weights : (b) Si loss(ppm)-obtained from ICP-AE analysis of solution exposed to specimens; and (c) degradation -measured microscopically (SEM) from polished circular sections of exposed specimens. The results were follows: 1. Mass loss of Synergy was , it was the highest, there was no significant difference among the materials. 2. The degree of degradation layer depth of Synergy was , it was the highest, there was no significant difference among any other materials than Synergy. 3. There was no difference among the four materials in Si loss. 4. The correlation coefficient between mass loss and degradation depth was relatively high(r=0.06, p<0.05). 5. There was no coefficient correlation between Si loss and mass loss, the degree of degradation layer depth and Si loss. 6. When observed with SEM, destruction of bonding is observed between resin matrix and filler.

Å°¿öµå

º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø;Ç¥¸éÇÏ ºÐÇØ;¾ËÄ«¸®¼º ¿ë¾×
Composite resins;Subsurface degradation;Alkaline solution

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI